Cover image for Slavophile Empire Imperial Russia's Illiberal Path
Title:
Slavophile Empire Imperial Russia's Illiberal Path
Author:
Engelstein, Laura.
ISBN:
9780801459450
Personal Author:
Publication Information:
Ithaca : Cornell University Press, 2009. (Baltimore, Md. : Project MUSE, 2015)
Physical Description:
1 online resource (xii, 239 p., [2] p. of plates :) ill. (some col.) ;
Series:
Book collections on Project MUSE.
Contents:
Combined underdevelopment : discipline and the law in Imperial and Soviet Russia -- Revolution and the theater of public life : the triumph of extremes -- The dream of civil society : the law, the state, and religious toleration -- Holy Russia in modern times : the Slavophile quest for the lost faith -- Orthodox self-reflection in a modernizing age : the case of Ivan and Natal'ia Kireevskii -- Between art and icon : Aleksandr Ivanov's Russian Christ -- The old Slavophile steed : failed nationalism and the philosophers' Jewish problem.
Added Corporate Author:
Electronic Access:
Full text available:
Holds:
Copies:

Available:*

Library
Material Type
Item Barcode
Call Number
Shelf Location
Status
Item Holds
Searching...
eBook ER186764 DK189 .E54 2009 Electronic Resources
Searching...

On Order

Summary

Summary

Twentieth-century Russia, in all its political incarnations, lacked the basic features of the Western liberal model: the rule of law, civil society, and an uncensored public sphere. In Slavophile Empire , the leading historian Laura Engelstein pays particular attention to the Slavophiles and their heirs, whose aversion to the secular individualism of the West and embrace of an idealized version of the native past established a pattern of thinking that had an enduring impact on Russian political life.Imperial Russia did not lack for partisans of Western-style liberalism, but they were outnumbered, to the right and to the left, by those who favored illiberal options. In the book's rigorously argued chapters, Engelstein asks how Russia's identity as a cultural nation at the core of an imperial state came to be defined in terms of this antiliberal consensus. She examines debates on religion and secularism, on the role of culture and the law under a traditional regime presiding over a modernizing society, on the status of the empire's ethnic peripheries, and on the spirit needed to mobilize a multinational empire in times of war. These debates, she argues, did not predetermine the kind of system that emerged after 1917, but they foreshadowed elements of a political culture that are still in evidence today.